~1.50

Performance prediction
ratio achieved

~350

discretionary managers evaluated

~160

systematic strategies
evaluated

We help socially important institutional investors perform

Active management is undergoing a paradigm shift

Investors have come to realize that most managers cannot deliver persistent performance that justifies their fees

But the active vs. passive debate is a false dichotomy

The right question is: how can investors identify skilled managers? Falling fees do not solve this more fundamental problem.

Manager selection boils down to performance prediction

Predicting performance is no easier than predicting markets, and what is needed is a rigorous scientific approach.

Active management is undergoing a paradigm shift

Investors have come to realize that most managers cannot deliver persistent performance that justifies their fees

But the active vs. passive debate is a false dichotomy

The right question is: how can investors identify skilled managers? Falling fees do not solve this more fundamental problem.

Manager selection boils down to performance prediction

Predicting performance is no easier than predicting markets, and what is needed is a rigorous scientific approach.

Active management is undergoing a paradigm shift

Investors have come to realize that most managers cannot deliver persistent performance that justifies their fees.

But the active vs. passive debate is a false dichotomy

The right question is: how can investors identify skilled managers? Falling fees do not solve the problem if investors continue allocating to unskilled managers.

Manager selection boils down to performance prediction

Predicting performance is no easier than predicting markets. Purely qualitative and backward-looking attribution analyses are not enough.

And what is needed is a rigorous scientific approach

It will do for active investing what biostatistics has done for medicine and what sabermetrics has done for sports.

Active management is undergoing a paradigm shift

Many investors have come to realize that most managers cannot deliver persistent performance that justifies their fees.

But the active vs. passive debate is a false dichotomy

Skilled active investing is better than passive investing, and skilled managers do exist. The real question is how to correctly identify them.

Manager selection boils down to performance prediction

Predicting performance is no easier than predicting markets, and what we believe is needed is a rigorous scientific approach.

The sole purpose of Goose™ is prediction

Allocate to managers who are likely to deliver persistent performance
(and more than justify their fees)

Learn more

Clients: please ask your administrator for portal access

We are pioneers in performance prediction

~1.50

~350

~160

We help socially important institutional investors perform

Active management is undergoing a paradigm shift

But the active vs. passive debate is a false dichotomy

Manager selection boils down to performance prediction

Active management is undergoing a paradigm shift

But the active vs. passive debate is a false dichotomy

Manager selection boils down to performance prediction

Active management is undergoing a paradigm shift

But the active vs. passive debate is a false dichotomy

Manager selection boils down to performance prediction

And what is needed is a rigorous scientific approach

Active management is undergoing a paradigm shift

But the active vs. passive debate is a false dichotomy

Manager selection boils down to performance prediction

The sole purpose of Goose™ is prediction

We are pioneers
in performance prediction